From owner-freebsd-questions Tue May 23 00:01:58 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA09802 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 23 May 1995 00:01:58 -0700 Received: from zap.zap.qc.ca (zap.zap.qc.ca [198.168.127.8]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA09794 for ; Tue, 23 May 1995 00:01:53 -0700 Received: (from fortin@localhost) by zap.zap.qc.ca (8.6.9/8.6.6) id DAA00442; Tue, 23 May 1995 03:01:37 -0400 From: Denis Fortin Message-Id: <199505230701.DAA00442@zap.zap.qc.ca> Subject: Re: FreeBSD question... To: gil@limbic.ssdl.com (Gil Kloepfer Jr.) Date: Tue, 23 May 1995 03:01:36 -0400 (EDT) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199505221611.LAA20044@limbic.ssdl.com> from "Gil Kloepfer Jr." at May 22, 95 11:11:46 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 857 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > >I recently heard that FreeBSD was no longer being supported and/or > > >developed. Is this true?? Thanks in advance for replying. > > > > Exactly the opposite. Where did you hear that??? > > I can't answer for the original poster, but when I started working at > one of my jobs some time ago, a lot of the people there thought that 386BSD > and FreeBSD were the same animal. I bet a penny that someone heard that "Berkeley will no longer be releasing further 4.xBSD releases", which got translated into "BSD isn't supported anymore by its makers", which got translated into "FreeBSD is no longer being supported". Oh well. I also hear that Microsoft is buying the Vatican... (:-) -- Denis Fortin fortin@acm.org DMR Group Inc, (514) 877-3301 These opinions are my own