From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Mar  7 04:34:07 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA04560
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 04:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA04547
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 04:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.7.4/8.6.9) id EAA18808; Thu, 7 Mar 1996 04:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 04:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199603071233.EAA18808@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: adam@veda.is
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <199603062341.XAA07033@veda.is> (message from Adam David on Wed, 6 Mar 1996 23:41:18 +0000 (GMT))
Subject: Re: PATCH_PRFX in bsd.port.mk
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * It was another person who completed part of this support (just for
 * the record).  Yes, the main idea was to handle such cases
 * generically. This new change is an improvement, though slightly
 * more restrictive (which is not necessarily a bad thing either).

Ok, I'll make the changes probably tomorrow.  (I just got back and
need to go to sleep now....)

Satoshi