From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Dec 17 14:50:59 2000 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 17 14:50:54 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca [209.151.24.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D8F137B404 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 14:50:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (nox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca [209.151.24.6]) by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA15093; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:50:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from sandelman.ottawa.on.ca ([2002:401a:9bfe:3:2a0:24ff:feac:5c52]) by nox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eBHNCY813776 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified OK); Sun, 17 Dec 2000 15:12:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.11.0/8.11.0) id eBHN44w01785; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 18:04:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA26915 for ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:50:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA63144; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:51:16 GMT (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20001216124841.01e27c20@mail.etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:53:22 -0500 To: opentrax@email.com, dr@kyx.net From: Dennis Subject: Re: Fwd: kyxtech: freebsd outsniffed by wintendo !!?!? Cc: tcpdump-workers@tcpdump.org, ethereal-dev@ethereal.com, snort-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, tech@openbsd.org In-Reply-To: <200012121436.GAA03155@spammie.svbug.com> References: <0012072118150Q.09615@smp.kyx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Im confused as to what difference it makes? No production server should ever use bpf for any "performance" oriented function anyway. Plus if you are doing network testing you should write to dev/null or a ram disk or better yet dump the packets rather than store them, Every disk will be different so you need to get that variable out of the equation. DB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message