Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 16:43:22 +0200 From: "Cyrille Lefevre" <clefevre-lists@9online.fr> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, "Michael Nottebrock" <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: linimon@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/automake14 [was: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion] Message-ID: <054101c43a8a$fa23e210$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> References: <200405150337.i4F3bMhH069783@quark.rcs.purdue.edu> <044901c43a6d$f4299a70$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> <200405151340.44395.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <40A608E1.9030504@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Oliver Eikemeier" <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> wrote: > Michael Nottebrock wrote: > > On Saturday 15 May 2004 13:15, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > > >>I suppose a version bump is needed somewhere ? > > > > I believe the new automake/conf ports are still stuck in testing on the exp > > cluster. The 'legacy' versions of automake/autoconf have recently been > > updated to the latest releases from their respective branches, so there's no > > point in rushing things, also see the expiration date. ;-) > > Ahem, I guess the you could interpret the original question as: where is the > point of telling people to use automake18 (and setting an expiration date), > if this doesn't work? or even not referenced yet ! > Telling them the current tools suck, but the new ones are not stable (or not > available at all) will only drive developers away from using them. you read in my mind, thanks. Cyrille Lefevre. -- home: mailto:cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?054101c43a8a$fa23e210$7890a8c0>