From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Nov 21 8:51:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from murphys-outbound.servers.plus.net (unknown [212.159.14.225]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 659A637B4CF for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 08:51:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 4957 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2000 16:51:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO daemon.lpds.sublink.org) (212.159.56.25) by murphys with SMTP; 21 Nov 2000 16:51:33 -0000 Received: from pelissero.org (hyde.lpds.sublink.org [10.0.0.2]) by daemon.lpds.sublink.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01376 for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:26:17 GMT (envelope-from wcp@pelissero.org) Received: (from wcp@localhost) by pelissero.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA45168; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:31:39 GMT (envelope-from wcp) From: "Walter C. Pelissero" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14874.41835.112830.531578@hyde.lpds.sublink.org> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:31:39 +0000 (GMT) To: Dan Nelson Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SVR4 missing syscall In-Reply-To: <20001121094313.A1118@dan.emsphone.com> References: <14873.23011.159826.718978@hyde.lpds.sublink.org> <20001120130301.A10520@dan.emsphone.com> <14874.23121.801503.448167@hyde.lpds.sublink.org> <20001121094313.A1118@dan.emsphone.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: walter@pelissero.org X-Attribution: WP Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dan Nelson writes: > > Are you telling me that the IBCS emulator is not really working? > > Unfortunately I can't ask for a Linux version. Have you ever had a > > look at the NetBSD one? Is it usable? > > If you have access to NetBSD binaries, get them. FreeBSD should be > able to run static NetBSD, OpenBSD, and BSD/OS binaries natively; no > emulation layer required. Sorry, I wasn't clear. I asked if the NetBSD emulation layer for svr4/ibcs is better than the FreeBSD one. In the meanwhile I fetched NetBSD 1.4.2 and I can assure it has the same problem, with a slightly differen output from ktrace. I'll try to make use of your hints. > I have patches for a June 30 -current that implement enough SCO stuff > to make /bin/sh work (but /bin/ls dies), if you're interested. That would be great. Thanks a lot. -- walter pelissero http://www.pelissero.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message