From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 21 11:36:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4912B37B71A for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:36:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f2LI3R627336; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:03:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:03:27 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jan Conrad Cc: Gordon Tetlow , Matt Dillon , Rich Morin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NFS performance Message-ID: <20010321100327.K12319@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20010321100015.J12319@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 07:01:50PM +0100 X-all-your-base: are belong to us. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Jan Conrad [010321 10:01] wrote: > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > * Jan Conrad [010321 09:57] wrote: > > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > > > > > As an aside you probably want to force to 100baseTx if you > > > > are using a switch. > > > > > > I'll try to convince the administrator of that switch (very difficult) > > > > He meant on the interface on the machine via ifconfig on your box. > > > > > The switch in configured to 100baseTX, half-duplex, no auto-sense :-( Ew, NFS over half duplex is "poo". -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message