From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 21:39:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111F81065672 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 21:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20D98FC1A for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 21:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl) Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D50851D0DE; Tue, 26 May 2009 23:39:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:39:21 +0200 From: Ed Schouten To: FreeBSD Current Message-ID: <20090526213921.GD48776@hoeg.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Subject: CFT: ee 1.5.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:39:23 -0000 Hi all, Some days ago Bruce Cran and I were talking on IRC about the ancient version of ee(1) we have in the tree. Today I spent some time moving ee(1) to contrib/ee with proper mergeinfo in place, to make it easier to upgrade it. It turns out all local modifications we have to ee(1) right now (line numbers, mktemp, etc) have been implemented upstream as well, in most cases even better. So I've decided to switch to an almost clean copy of ee(1). My patch so far (requires a very recent source tree): http://80386.nl/pub/ee-freebsd-1.5.0.diff Any comments before I commit this patch to SVN? -- Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/