From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 10 01:18:37 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA22361 for current-outgoing; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:18:37 -0700 Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id BAA22353 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 01:18:32 -0700 Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0t2ZtK-0003wvC; Tue, 10 Oct 95 01:18 PDT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA00709; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:18:22 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: Ollivier Robert , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Current Users' list) Subject: Re: PHK malloc against Mark Moraes malloc In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Oct 1995 16:46:46 MST." <199510092346.QAA02723@aslan.cdrom.com> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 09:18:22 +0100 Message-ID: <707.813313102@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > >Here are the results of a quick test between our now standard malloc made > >by Poul-Henning (malloc/2), Mark Moraes' malloc (in port under > >devel/libmalloc) and GNU malloc: > > > >PHK malloc/2: > > Were these test performed without EXTRA_SANITY defined in phkmalloc? > I doubt it... Ollivier, can you rerun with EXTRA_SANITY disabled please ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. It will be some time yet before progress goes too far... (Poul Henningsen)