From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Apr  9 18:31:41 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA03061
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 18:31:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tok.qiv.com ([204.214.141.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA03035
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 18:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by tok.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id UAA04597;
	Wed, 9 Apr 1997 20:31:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost)
	by acp.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA00998;
	Wed, 9 Apr 1997 19:38:04 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: acp.qiv.com: jdn owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 19:38:04 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Jay D. Nelson" <jdn@qiv.com>
To: Philip Crewdson <philip@state51.co.uk>
cc: questions <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ppp or pppd?
In-Reply-To: <l03010d00af71c582313f@[194.159.145.12]>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970409193748.929C-100000@acp.qiv.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

More reliable, faster.

-- Jay

On Wed, 9 Apr 1997, Philip Crewdson wrote:

->Just a quickie.
->
->The handbook seems to encourage using ppp, and yet judging from recent
->posts a lot of people are using pppd. Any particular reason?
->
->
->=============
->Philip Crewdson
->
->philip@state51.co.uk
->
->a member of the state51 conspiracy
->http://www.state51.co.uk/
->
->raft crew
->http://www.vmg.co.uk/
->
->