From owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 19:22:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5EF16A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:22:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7D143D2F for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:22:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7]) (authenticated bits=0) i7TJMAaI066909 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:22:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7TJLrsu072805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:21:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7TJLq1n010116; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:21:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7TJLqdn010115; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:21:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:21:51 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Wilko Bulte Message-ID: <20040829192149.GB59909@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20040829095002.GA43484@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20040829131149.GA59909@cicely12.cicely.de> <20040829190120.GA45159@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040829190120.GA45159@freebie.xs4all.nl> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on cicely5.cicely.de cc: Gheorghe Ardelean cc: ticso@cicely.de cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETA1 for Alpha available X-BeenThere: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Alpha List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:22:16 -0000 On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:01:20PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 03:11:50PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote.. > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:50:02AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:40:33AM +0200, Gheorghe Ardelean wrote.. > > ... > > > > > On AXPpci33 it dies while testing sym0. Before this sym0 reports: > > > > sym0: <810> port 0x10100-0x101ff mem 0x81854100-0x818541ff at device 6.0 on pci0 > > > > sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-10, SE, parity checking > > > > CACHE TEST FAILED: timeout. > > > > sym0: CACHE INCORRECTLY CONFIGURED. > > > > > > > > fatal kernel trap: > > > > > > > > trap entry = 0x4 (unaligned access fault) > > > > cpuid = 0 > > > > faulting va = 0xdeadc0dedeadc0de > > > > Mmm - it's dereferencing nonsense. > > Guess this bug is old and just triggered as a result of the timeout. > > I'm missing an IRQ in the probe, so the timeout is reasonable. > > Normaly we should see: > > sym0: interrupting at ISA irq 11 > > A complete boot -v output would be interessting to see routing > > decisions - sounds much like someone broke IRQ routing on alpha. > > LCA based alphas are the only alphas so far that we have enabled > > interrupt routing and possibly the only alphas that share ISA and PCI > > interrupts. > > Ruslan just reported that BETA1 just installed fine on his NoName > (see his posting to alpha@). I saw - even Gheorghe reported his System to boot with -v. Seems like the IRQ line was intended to be printed after the panic. Would be nice to know how this could be reproduced. > > > Hmm.... Both PC64 and AXPpci33 are EV4x machines.. Hmm.. all my test > > > boxes are >= EV5 > > > > To be exact AXPpci33 is LCA with an 21066 CPU or LCA45 with an 21066A > > CPU, which is very similar to EV4 and EV45. > > Ruslan has a 166MHz, so an 21066 CPU. Unless he underclocked his System :) > > It seems that those boards are sold with 21066 CPUs only and that > > 21066A only made it into Alphabooks and maybe some Multias. > > Not true. I at some point had a 233MHz NoName. Don't know if it > was originally supplied with that CPU. I also had a 233MHz Multia > at some point. Whatever.. I know that the board works with an A type CPU and their higher clock rates, but 21066A CPUs are not mentioned in my Version of AXPpci33's "OEM Design Guide". What is mentioned in it is a 21068 66MHz CPU, which I don't know anything else about. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de