Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:26:08 -0500
From:      Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>
To:        Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r223648 - head/sys/dev/gem
Message-ID:  <4E15DE20.2040000@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110707160736.GE88226@alchemy.franken.de>
References:  <201106281616.p5SGGhbx056614@svn.freebsd.org> <4E15C3FF.5030703@freebsd.org> <20110707160736.GE88226@alchemy.franken.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/07/11 11:07, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 09:34:39AM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>> This breaks one of my gem devices (chip=0x0021106b) when the controller
>> is initialized from FreeBSD (netbooting works fine, and the controller
>> stays working after that), with "cannot disable RX MAC" or "cannot
>> disable RX MAC or hash filter" messages.
> Are you positive that it's exactly this revision which breaks things?
> Actually there was a report from Justin Hibbits that r222135 causing
> a GMAC to no longer work with similar symptoms, which still is unsolved
> AFAICT. If it's really r223648 which is causing problems in your case
> please try to figure out which part is causing that as none of the
> changes exactly stands out as disruptive, probably best by reverting
> gem_reset_rx() and gem_setladrf() one by one.
>

You're right. r223648 just added the printf(), r222135 is where it began 
not working.
-Nathan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E15DE20.2040000>