From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 13:21:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B6D16A4CE for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:21:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6080543D3F for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:21:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 20C1266E32; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:21:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:21:31 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Trevor Johnson Message-ID: <20040130212130.GA86224@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040130133028.V74416@blues.jpj.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040130133028.V74416@blues.jpj.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: big PLIST_FILES patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 21:21:32 -0000 --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:45:24PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: > I've noticed that many ports have just one line in their packing list. > I've made a patch to use the PLIST_FILES variable in place of most these > simple packing lists, in order to reduce the numbers of inodes and blocks > that users need to unpack the ports collection. This patch would affect > 1,217 ports. There are 50-odd pkg-plist files that just have a comment in > them; this patch doesn't address those (I have a hunch that they could > just be removed without causing problems). >=20 > The patch is at > > and the list of pkg-plist files to be removed is at > > (its first line is a comment). >=20 > My intention is to ask for it to be tested on the package-building > cluster, then if all goes well, to commit it. I'm looking here for any > suggestions or objections. If you'd like your ports to be left out of > this, please speak up. When do you think you'll be able to fix all those plist problems in your ports, and other port build failures? I'd prefer you did this before working on other port changes, since they've been broken for going on 3 months or more now. Kris --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAGsraWry0BWjoQKURAnZ2AJ4piQyiqbzNoTMIBZpFAe6imK027wCfVVvI 2w/ubJu/cP9KYHPVr8Ixgjc= =DqAK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--