Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:28:26 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ports need a uniq identifier, do you have any suggestion? Message-ID: <20120613212826.00000bd4@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20120611131222.GW60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120611043001.GO60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAF6rxg=Z5C=_JZ6B9vut-g9mdDq8c6AN_e1TaPAyEFQYkjBBvA@mail.gmail.com> <20120611073017.GT60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <4FD5E522.4020506@gmail.com> <20120611131222.GW60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:12:22 +0200 Baptiste Daroussin
<bapt@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Plus ${ORIGIN}_${SUBPACKAGE} is fragile because you can have a port
> which is: lang/mylang with a subpackage bla which will give
> lang/mylang_bla and a port lang/mylang_bla with no subpackage which
> will give lang/mylang_bla
Chose a delimiter which is unlikely to show up in a portname, ore use
e.g. 4 underscores. The generic idea is not bad, you just have to find
a suitable delimiter, and IMO it doesn't matter if it is ugly (like
____), or not.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120613212826.00000bd4>