From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 5 06:42:17 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA16833 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 5 May 1996 06:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (root@tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp [133.246.32.58]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA16827 for ; Sun, 5 May 1996 06:42:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (masafumi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp (8.7.5/3.4W4-SMTP) with ESMTP id WAA08460; Sun, 5 May 1996 22:42:08 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199605051342.WAA08460@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: max@sfc.wide.ad.jp Subject: date change and wtmp record From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= Reply-To: max@sfc.wide.ad.jp X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 05 May 1996 22:42:07 +0900 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I noticed wtmp(5) man page says that `{' is recorded in the field ut_line when the system date is changed. However, `}' is recorded in my wtmp instead. Which one, `{' or `}', is the expected character to be recorded? I think it is better to have wtmp(5) and the actual behavior matched. Thanks ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Masafumi NAKANE, Keio Univ., Dept. of Environmental Information E-Mail : t94303mn@sfc.keio.ac.jp / max@sfc.wide.ad.jp [URL] : http://www.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~t94303mn