From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 29 07:27:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414F0B3 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:27:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F048FC08 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9T7Rnlg037680; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:27:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <508E2FF5.1030705@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:27:49 -0700 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121023 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: 'device atapicam' breaks the build References: <508E0944.9080903@rawbw.com> <20121029115230.21872b62@X220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20121029115230.21872b62@X220.ovitrap.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:27:51 -0000 On 10/28/2012 21:52, Erich Dollansky wrote: > # options ATA_CAM # Handle > legacy controllers with CAM > # options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering > > It looks like you have to disable above's options. Unfortunately the root disk on this machine is attached to ata3 and isn't visible when 'device ATA_CAM' is commented out. (mountroot> prompt shows up on boot only listing ahci-compatible disks). Does this mean that in order to see such (older) disks I have to have 'device ATA_CAM'? Or there is some workaround? Does it also mean that atapicam won't load in case such older disks are in use? If yes, why there is such dependency? Yuri