From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org  Wed Jan 18 17:03:51 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C013DCB68D3
 for <freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF0A1EC8;
 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org)
Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net
 [73.231.226.104])
 by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4242810A7DB;
 Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:03:50 -0500 (EST)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
Cc: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
 Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Strange issue after early AP startup
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:50:48 -0800
Message-ID: <61871203.aVMyyfjlhL@ralph.baldwin.cx>
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-STABLE; KDE/4.14.10; amd64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <24593c49-b0d5-8aaf-e11b-bfef4704267e@selasky.org>
References: <b9c53237-4b1a-a140-f692-bf5837060b18@selasky.org>
 <3558195.Ack1AKBXSB@ralph.baldwin.cx>
 <24593c49-b0d5-8aaf-e11b-bfef4704267e@selasky.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (mail.baldwin.cx); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:03:50 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail.baldwin.cx
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:03:51 -0000

On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 09:00:52 AM Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 01/18/17 02:18, John Baldwin wrote:
> > You might still want to adjust 'nextevent' to schedule the next interrupt
> > to be sooner than 'timerperiod' though.  You could just set 'nextevent' to
> > 'now' in that case instead of 'next'.
> 
> Right, I'll give that a spin. Would have to be "now + 1" instead of 
> "now", due to check before et_start() ?

Ugh, ok.  + 1 with sbintime_t is kind of odd which is why I would have liked
to avoid it, but it seems it is required.

-- 
John Baldwin