From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Feb 17 12:32:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE9937B841 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:32:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C4512255; Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:32:18 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: <20000217182741.20025.qmail@nwcst267.netaddress.usa.net> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:31:37 +0100 To: Jonathon McKitrick , chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: BSD vs Linux comments Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 9:00 PM +0100 2000/2/17, Brad Knowles wrote: > I think our network stack still beats theirs, but maybe 2.3 really > does fix some of those problems -- I wonder if the folks at NFS, the > authors of ntop, and Darren Reed (author of IP filter) have any > thoughts on that. %s/NFS/NFR/ Sigh.... -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message