From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 14 21:17:37 2011
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81505106566C;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:17:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sup.oook.cz (sup.oook.cz [94.23.0.135])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0B38FC13;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:17:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.23] (ip-78-102-160-251.net.upcbroadband.cz
	[78.102.160.251]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by sup.oook.cz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5ELIUIa066968;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:18:31 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <4DF7CF8E.7000703@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201106141639.p5EGdJ2k003510@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<1308083456.84213.7.camel@hood.oook.cz>
	<BANLkTi=FeXUcAxE8ReP+JtJWxSGoVTEiOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DF7CF8E.7000703@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-ikv8bH9BovDcoAx5qAAh"
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:17:29 +0200
Message-ID: <1308086249.84213.11.camel@hood.oook.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 94.23.0.135
X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: sup.oook.cz; Sender-ip: 78.102.160.251;
	Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; )
Cc: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports UIDs
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 21:17:37 -0000


--=-ikv8bH9BovDcoAx5qAAh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Olli Hauer p=ED=B9e v =FAt 14. 06. 2011 v 23:15 +0200:
> On 2011-06-14 22:41, Chris Rees wrote:
> > 2011/6/14 Pav Lucistnik <pav@freebsd.org>:
> >> Maybe I missed something, but why do we need nobody user here, when we
> >> already have it in default master.passwd on every new installation?
> >>
> >> $ grep nobody /usr/src/etc/master.passwd
> >> nobody:*:65534:65534::0:0:Unprivileged user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nol=
ogin
> >>
> >=20
> > Because the code in bsd.port.mk fails if a group is in GROUPS but not G=
IDs.
> >=20
> > Of course, I realised as you pointed that out that it's unnecessary,
> > because the nobody reference isn't in GROUPS, so not parsed by that
> > code.
> >=20
> > Should I remove the line in UIDs / GIDs?
> >=20
>=20
> I think it's not a bad Idea to have even the default system
> users in ports/GIDs ports/UIDs.

What for? They will never be added to the system (because group of same
name is already present)


--=20
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>
It also explains why paper clips just lie there while you look at them,
but as soon as you turn your back, they run away, giggling wildly, and
transform themselves into coat hangers.

--=-ikv8bH9BovDcoAx5qAAh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)

iEYEABECAAYFAk33z+kACgkQntdYP8FOsoJu6gCaA6wNFtqoLC7M4FNsErUva4zK
hnsAoLJLU8hZxohLuxdQ/LPP/FzuFtr/
=PTUz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-ikv8bH9BovDcoAx5qAAh--