From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Mar 19 16:16:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18BB37B721 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:16:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@mips.inka.de) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 14f9mx-0003A8-00; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:14:15 +0100 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f2JNajT17957 for freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:36:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: How serious are we about ccc? Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 23:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <99656d$hgs$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Do we consider ccc (ports/lang/compaq-cc) just a curiosity and squarely put the blame on ccc if something doesn't build with it, or do we want ccc do have a modicum of usefulness? Lest this be misunderstood, I'm merely asking an honest question. I recently built the mawk port with ccc, which works. Today I've tried Ogg Vorbis. Libtool doesn't handle building shared libraries with ccc (which I would assume to be a configuration issue) and the compiler dies on some of our system header files, which I haven't examined yet. Is there any worth in investigating these problems? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message