From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 7 14:46:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA73106566C for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beni.brinckman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com (mail-ob0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E4B8FC12 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 14:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbun3 with SMTP id un3so20998692obb.13 for ; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 07:46:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3g50kizVKjxW4P2ki3J87mPSGQJfo7FmRtt956nAH8c=; b=dnfwSjhygp+M2h+FC3L8bx06b6e/i+b8jAoUNCIaOPhrTPPBILm4Vtc+453OKcRccy SgzTp7iNstIU9KRIdfKhz32FkwAL8zqQ/oOAPw1EPMB00wKgjeqbZKbu6M4H9nKevrGZ Tq4s22gP+O7vIMRgkWCl1X0JOmJLprHyS/iVVZ92JgDo5XoD7HUIpZva0hndngNfwetQ m1YMpxAtlUqNYXkACWL641SByRzqK6t9bx6mIap1a7A6WiGoZaD74/vwQS3Q7nXDTkE0 g9+40vjv6dOymtTcNC5DvTprNcomjcF2Gt4+wRvtjH31p4KVS5s7BTTNiGP9Z0SRs6ku 19AA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.168.230 with SMTP id zz6mr34991747oeb.11.1341672377194; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 07:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.69.41 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jul 2012 07:46:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 16:46:17 +0200 Message-ID: From: Beni Brinckman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: GUI for "gpart" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:46:18 -0000 2012/7/7 Wojciech Puchar : >> I have heard, although I never personally saw it, a GUI for "gpart" I >> heard that there exists one for Linux. Is there any comparable one for >> FreeBSD and comparable with KDE? > > no idea. If you want it with already installed system, try to compile linux > software. > > Anyway i see no reason for such a software, click-click solutions are always > inefficient relative to normal text based ones, and partitioning is not a > job that end user (who want click-click interfaces at all cost) is supposed > to do What happened to the idea of "having a choice" ? If you want to keep living in the 80's with a text based menu, go ahead, I prefer a click solution. And I see no reason why a click solution is "always" inefficient. That depends on the programmer making the interface. I'm a desktop user. So I should mind my own business and shut up because some old (or senior if you prefer) server guy has a problem using a mouse ? No thanks ! I prefer to live in 2012 and use the technical means of nowadays. No flames intended, just my opinion (which has nothing to do with the original question, I know). Beni.