From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 18 03:06:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD8E106566B for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04418FC08 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so297814fga.13 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:05:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FYikbbrzIWaHO19VB6o8rtYxfI1rgg9thP/17jyZp0Q=; b=JuoQjW3LKf3pGgXp29BDdR1VJdnpEk2a3q8srPVzOxL5nPiiXAYYZfEVTqhTEcmW3m MEur5u9L4kddY4jnrzjs7+rwB1Iqmc8dzCT+nhoIc1tO7BEDySa0akBFOh9YFStjkNSr oMnOEb8bnzCMgRhVSbRLPl0muItTvK6esu5Ns= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=vibPcmwSCSvREBJ/7g0wcx2sW7nUtNTT2gh9zs4By5SkBFDL9cxXcwHzT0HouijL8z wyFAdSbomGTRzmxSYLBJLEmQf8HsF/8WMqvFkyA8vCJ2o2cBfl0BERxhFYn5ZJVSeCkx u4awm3Ld5BmAf8iQxJ6UjIXbcQvPyeioBZVqk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.235.20 with SMTP id i20mr4869769muh.38.1258513559491; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:05:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091118000838.60CBC1CC47@ptavv.es.net> References: <200911172043.28008.gnemmi@gmail.com> <20091118000838.60CBC1CC47@ptavv.es.net> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:05:59 -0300 Message-ID: <19e9a5dc0911171905r67f4e9c4q8513782cce8f5f82@mail.gmail.com> From: Gonzalo Nemmi To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: WITHOUT_TELNET=yes .. does it work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:06:01 -0000 On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > From: Gonzalo Nemmi > > Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:43:27 -0200 > > Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > > > On Tuesday 17 November 2009 8:30:41 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > Check out the scripts in src/tools/tools/build_option_survey/ > > > > > > The result looked like this on stable-7 some time ago: > > > > > > http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/stable7_build_options/ > > > > > > no effect .. > > Interesting ... > > Thanks for the link Mr. Poul-Henning Kamp > > I can state that several of the src.conf options in 8.0 don't work and > some will break the build. There is an open PR that has a fix to > Makefile.inc1 for at least some of the problems. > > That said, building a new world without telnet does not delete the > existing binaries, libs, header files, etc. It just causes them not to > be built again. Further, delete-old will not delete them. > I can confirm that. Telnet creation date is predate that of the binaries created by buildworld > If you build with some parts of the base system removed in this manner, > you really need to go in and remove the old stuff by hand. It won't be > created arain. > Thanks for the advise Kevin! > N.B. I have not tried WITHOUT_TELNET=, so I can't swear that ti works. I > build WITHOUT_OPENSSH and WITHOUT_BIND as I use the ports with > OVERWRITE_BASE. and WITHOUT_BIND works fine. WITHOUT_OPENSSH requires > the patches mentions above for Makefile.inc1 (thanks to bf for those). > -- > R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer > Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) > Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) > E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 > Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 > Best Regards Gonzalo Nemmi