From owner-freebsd-arch  Thu Nov  7 14: 3:39 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E311F37B401; Thu,  7 Nov 2002 14:03:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (12-232-206-8.client.attbi.com [12.232.206.8])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 63B4F43E6E; Thu,  7 Nov 2002 14:03:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA06995;
	Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 13:51:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG,
	"Long,    Scott" <Scott_Long@adaptec.com>, re@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Maksim Yevmenkin <myevmenk@exodus.net>,
	Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com>
Subject: Re: Bluetooth code 
In-Reply-To: <035101c286a3$4a7ccf80$52557f42@errno.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211071349350.5860-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Sam Leffler wrote:

> > In message <031401c2869f$db71b720$52557f42@errno.com>, "Sam Leffler"
> writes:
> > >I made a quick pass over this code.  It's not clear to me why this stuff
> is
> > >or should be dependent on netgraph.  The code looks to support a new
> > >protocol domain and sockets within that domain so it would seem possible
> for
> > >it to stand apart from netgraph.  A bluetooth implementation that was not
> > >tied to netgraph would be preferrable as freebsd users would get the
> > >benefits of additional (non-freebsd users) working with the code.
> > >
> > >Specific stuff:
> > >
> > >1. Why isn't btsockstat integrated into netstat?
> >
> > Actually, isn't netstat(8) hairy enough as it is ?
> >
> 
> I understand why btsockstat was written as a standalone program.  However I
> think it would be better to integrate it into the program people know to use
> to view active sockets.

As I mantioned elsewhere the bluetooth code has all been written
to completely be standalone and not alter any existing code, even
Makefiles.  I agree that later when the whole code is less experimental
it could be merged into netstat. In the meanwhile it makes sense
to have a separate program.

> 
>     Sam
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message