Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 10:10:08 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@peedub.muc.de> To: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i4b syncppp not talking with Ascend Max - followup Message-ID: <199912080910.KAA06613@peedub.muc.de> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 07 Dec 1999 21:27:57 %2B0100." <19991207212756.A1824@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As a followup to my previous mail, it seems like this trivial change
should allow each isp interface (up to 15) to be assigned a unique
address. I expect that this would eliminate the problems which we've
been seeing when more than one interface has 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.1 assigned,
since we could now use 0.0.0.0/[0.0.0.1 thru 0.0.0.15] instead, which
should be enough for most users ;-)
This diff is against the code in FreeBSD-current and is untested.
Beware ! Cut & paste.
*** /sys/net/if_spppsubr.c.orig Wed Dec 8 09:54:36 1999
--- /sys/net/if_spppsubr.c Wed Dec 8 10:09:09 1999
***************
*** 2656,2665 ****
desiredaddr = p[2] << 24 | p[3] << 16 |
p[4] << 8 | p[5];
if (desiredaddr == hisaddr ||
! (hisaddr == 1 && desiredaddr != 0)) {
/*
* Peer's address is same as our value,
! * or we have set it to 0.0.0.1 to
* indicate that we do not really care,
* this is agreeable. Gonna conf-ack
* it.
--- 2656,2666 ----
desiredaddr = p[2] << 24 | p[3] << 16 |
p[4] << 8 | p[5];
if (desiredaddr == hisaddr ||
! (hisaddr > 0 && hisaddr <= 15 && desiredaddr != 0)) {
/*
* Peer's address is same as our value,
! * or we have set it to 0.0.0.1 thru
! * 0.0.0.15 to
* indicate that we do not really care,
* this is agreeable. Gonna conf-ack
* it.
---
Gary Jennejohn / garyj@muc.de garyj@fkr.cpqcorp.net gj@freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912080910.KAA06613>