From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 11 19:30:43 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33B91065672 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (mail.lispworks.com [193.34.186.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB9E8FC15 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (higson [192.168.1.7]) by lwfs1-cam.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7BJKGup044288; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:20:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from martin@lispworks.com) Received: from higson.cam.lispworks.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4) id p7BJKGC1021863; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:20:16 +0100 Received: (from martin@localhost) by higson.cam.lispworks.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p7BJKGjc021859; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:20:16 +0100 Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:20:16 +0100 Message-Id: <201108111920.p7BJKGjc021859@higson.cam.lispworks.com> From: Martin Simmons To: emulation@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <4E42E7F4.5040502@gmail.com> (message from Volodymyr Kostyrko on Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:20:04 +0300) References: <20110810060822.GZ60956@droso.net> <4E42E7F4.5040502@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: [ports-i386@freebsd.org: linux-f10-flashplugin-10.3r181.34 failed on i386 9] X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:30:44 -0000 >>>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 23:20:04 +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko said: > > PS: As far as I understand the main problem is about mirroring correct > player versions. Anyone (even me) can apply for a redistribution rights > and make those files available for download the way we want (the way > each version will have unique url). Wouldn't that be dangerous, because it would allow easy use of old versions that contain critical vulnerabilities? __Martin