Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 23:13:06 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: install(1) to use a cross strip(1) Message-ID: <20020201231306.A670@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gang,
As part of doing cross development with our source tree I hit upon
the nasty habit of install(1) to want to use strip(1) and specificly
by that name. To make my live easier, I have made install(1) look
for an envvar first. Is this kind of flexibility generic enough to
have it committed?
--- xinstall.c 19 Dec 2001 06:05:42 -0000 1.47
+++ xinstall.c 27 Jan 2002 08:54:51 -0000
@@ -702,6 +702,7 @@
strip(to_name)
const char *to_name;
{
+ char *stripbin;
int serrno, status;
switch (fork()) {
@@ -711,7 +712,10 @@
errno = serrno;
err(EX_TEMPFAIL, "fork");
case 0:
- execlp("strip", "strip", to_name, (char *)NULL);
+ stripbin = getenv("STRIPBIN");
+ if (stripbin == NULL)
+ stripbin = "strip";
+ execlp(stripbin, stripbin, to_name, (char *)NULL);
err(EX_OSERR, "exec(strip)");
default:
if (wait(&status) == -1 || status) {
NOTE: I use STRIPBIN, because STRIP is already taken (see /usr/share/mk).
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020201231306.A670>