From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 19 20:07:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125F8106564A for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (marcuscom-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::1279]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98EDF8FC08 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3JK7rnh022949; Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:07:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Jonathan Chen In-Reply-To: <20090419090405.GA3500@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <20090418105855.GA61453@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1240080177.18976.63.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20090418204411.GA73963@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1240092470.18976.80.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20090418233629.GA89603@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1240109972.1354.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20090419063220.GA99153@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1240123521.1354.27.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20090419090405.GA3500@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UkWKfwSMtznrPSYmVJw3" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:06:52 -0400 Message-Id: <1240171612.1354.49.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: console-kit-daemon leaking file descriptors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:07:05 -0000 --=-UkWKfwSMtznrPSYmVJw3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 21:04 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:45:21AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 18:32 +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:59:32PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > [...] > > > > Then that means you have a deeper problem. Most likely you do not = have > > > > procfs mounted on /proc. The console or /var/log/messages should h= ave > > > > warnings. > > >=20 > > > Hmm. Yes it does. I wasn't aware that GNOME required procfs mounted. > >=20 > > It's in the general GNOME FAQ and HAL FAQ. You definitely need procfs > > mounted. >=20 > The wording in both the FAQs appear to imply that procfs is optional. > Perhaps it should be changed to say that procfs is required for GNOME > to function correctly? How does this sound optional: "All users _MUST_ have procfs mounted on /proc." That's from the HAL FAQ. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-UkWKfwSMtznrPSYmVJw3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAknrhFsACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4fHvACcCgjAD7INRa/RTT3RCFPKIhvx Hh8An1ZbhDxvpQ84ylYYZTG+LsNFqkS5 =5Q3j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UkWKfwSMtznrPSYmVJw3--