From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Nov 19 12:58:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD8437B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:58:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.fiber.net (mail.fiber.net [216.83.130.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB4E43E3B for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 12:58:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adam@baylessfamily.org) Received: from yo_ink.fiber.net (user-250.office.fiber.net [216.83.129.250]) by mail.fiber.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAJL4EZ75015 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:04:14 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20021119134714.024133e8@mail.baylessfamily.org> X-Sender: abayless@mail.baylessfamily.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:57:50 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Adam Bayless Subject: Re: issues with Bind 9.2.1 In-Reply-To: <20021119204312.GA6313@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021119131930.024bb8e0@mail.baylessfamily.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20021119131930.024bb8e0@mail.baylessfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris, Thanks for the speedy reply. I wondered about hardware issues too, but on two different machines with vastly different hardware and no other indications of problems? The first machine is: CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1333.10-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x644 Stepping = 4 Features=0x183fbff AMD Features=0xc0440000<,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!> real memory = 268369920 (262080K bytes) avail memory = 255954944 (249956K bytes) and the second is: CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (334.09-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x660 Stepping = 0 Features=0x183f9ff real memory = 268435456 (262144K bytes) avail memory = 256024576 (250024K bytes) I'm following the standard instructions that come with bind for these builds (./configure; make; make install) so am I safe to assume it's gonna build for the right architecture? I've also tried building them from the ports collection with no better results. Any other thoughts? Thanks, Adam At 12:43 PM 11/19/2002 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 01:28:52PM -0700, Adam Bayless wrote: > > > Core was generated by `named'. > > Program terminated with signal 4, Illegal instruction. > >This probably means you either have: > >a) Compiled the binary for an incorrect architecture or CPU type >(e.g. pentium pro running on a pentium) > >b) something causing memory or filesystem corruption (i.e. bad >hardware) that has flipped a bit in the bind file. > >Kris ------------------------------------------------------------ Adam Bayless | vi /etc/mail/aliases Fibernet System Janitor | complaints: /dev/null adam@baylessfamily.org | :wq baylessfamily.org/~abayless | newaliases ------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message