From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 00:36:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970CE16A4B3; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com (kirk.webonaut.com [212.41.243.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7644043F75; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:36:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from klammer@webonaut.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0593C76426; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:36:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sv02.webonaut.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sv02.webonaut.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61359-06; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:36:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (sisko.webonaut.com [212.41.243.28]) by sv02.webonaut.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F5C76428; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:36:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Franz Klammer To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1066245462.721.42.camel@gyros> References: <1066241563.721.27.camel@gyros> <1066245462.721.42.camel@gyros> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1066289770.882.3.camel@sisko.webonaut.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:36:10 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at webonaut.com cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users cc: "Thomas E. Zander" cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: What to do with Mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 07:36:06 -0000 Am Mi, den 15.10.2003 schrieb Joe Marcus Clarke um 21:17: > On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 15:13, Thomas E. Zander wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 15. Oct 2003, at 14:12 -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote > > according to [RFC: What to do with Mozilla]: > > > > > what do we do with Mozilla 1.4.x? > > > > I don't see mozilla as something that's unlike any other port, so I'd > > think of an update to 1.5 as a completely normal port updating process. > > If we have a working 1.5 version I don't see a particular need to have > > an 1.4.x version. > > > > Simple, isn't it? :-) > > Yep. It's just last time I removed mozilla-vendor, I broke OOo. I want > to make sure there are no ports/projects that depend on 1.4.x. > what about putting them into marcuscom-cvs until you are sure that it breaks no other port? are running/compile galeon and epiphany with it? franz. > Joe > > > > > Riggs -- WEBONAUT.com http://webonaut.com mailto:klammer@webonaut.com