From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 16 10:24:38 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA27695 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 10:24:38 -0700 Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA27689 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 10:24:36 -0700 Received: from localhost.v-site.net (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA01785; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 10:09:58 -0700 Message-Id: <199506161709.KAA01785@rah.star-gate.com> X-Authentication-Warning: rah.star-gate.com: Host localhost.v-site.net didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6delta 4/7/95 To: "Marty Leisner" cc: Brian Tao , Jaye Mathisen , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printer recommendation? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 16 Jun 1995 07:12:26 PDT." <9506161412.AA14921@gnu.mc.xerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 10:09:57 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>> "Marty Leisner" said: > > You don't need anything faster than a parallel port. > > The biggest bottleneck is normally the PS decomposer, not the > network interface (you can also probably keep a printer busy > with a 19.2kbaud serial line). Oh, what about bitmap graphics wouldnt a PS file with lots of bitmap graphics take a long time to download to the printer? Tnks, Amancio