From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 15:34:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AAC16A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:34:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA15D43D69 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:34:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 86210 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 15:24:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Dec 2004 15:24:34 -0000 Message-ID: <41B8709C.329DD195@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 16:34:52 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <200412061902.iB6J2hJ6000543@repoman.freebsd.org> <41B58367.EB32CF1@freebsd.org> <20041207150937.GD1336@ip.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: glebius@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: SUZUKI Shinsuke cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_gif.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:34:50 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 11:18:15AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > I hope to remove the ability to have pointers into the routing table > > before 6.0 release. > > > This would make my WIP OBE, which is nice. But how are you going to > compensate for the performance loss of *not* having cached routes? Up to a couple of hundred kpps it doesn't matter and the only place where we have cached routes is in the various IP[46] tunnels. The caching makes locking of the routing table more complex and expensive. Once that can be simplified there is a significant amount of lookup cost going away. -- Andre