From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 28 17:21:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA6D1065678 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:21:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=2e2a31498d13a62da0deeb64394e9e30cbee5c10=654=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal3.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:14:3::8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969158FC12 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:21:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=2e2a31498d13a62da0deeb64394e9e30cbee5c10=654=es.net=oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal3.es.net (Postal Node 3) with ESMTP (SSL) id IUX50708 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:21:08 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id A39FB4500F for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:21:07 -0700 (PDT) To: gnome@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1206724867_12662P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:21:07 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20080328172107.A39FB4500F@ptavv.es.net> X-Sender-IP: 198.128.4.29 X-Sender-Domain: es.net X-Recipent: ; X-Sender: X-To_Name: X-To_Domain: freebsd.org X-To: gnome@freebsd.org X-To_Email: gnome@freebsd.org X-To_Alias: gnome Cc: Subject: GAM_POLLER vs. kqueue X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:21:10 -0000 --==_Exmh_1206724867_12662P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I see the newest version of gamin provides the option of running the GAM_POLLER instead of kqueue's. Anyone have any guidance on pros and cons? I'm sticking to the default unless I see a reason to change, but gam is annoying in that it can prevent unmounting volumes, so I thought that this might be relevant. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 --==_Exmh_1206724867_12662P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFH7SkDkn3rs5h7N1ERAnvMAJ9HmtjdrarqS+hVyGLN3lybsXyEKQCfbtje 8id55a+8DJde7Po8paCnQzM= =D8kw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1206724867_12662P--