From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 14 23:35:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from lists01.iafrica.com (lists01.iafrica.com [196.7.0.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D8937B400; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 23:35:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from nwl.fw.uunet.co.za ([196.31.2.162]) by lists01.iafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #2) id 14I4An-0005wA-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:35:25 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by nwl.fw.uunet.co.za (8.8.8/8.6.9) id JAA19843; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:35:23 +0200 (SAST) Received: by nwl.fw.uunet.co.za via recvmail id 19475; Mon Jan 15 09:34:21 2001 Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.fw.uunet.co.za) by axl.fw.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 14I49k-0008ry-00; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:34:20 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Andrea Campi , Poul-Henning Kamp , developer@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC In-reply-to: Your message of "15 Jan 2001 01:38:00 +0100." Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 09:34:20 +0200 Message-ID: <34097.979544060@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 15 Jan 2001 01:38:00 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > I'm tempted to suggest that the freebsd-small and / or PicoBSD gang > would be the right people to ask to maintain i386 support in FreeBSD. Guys, was Matt Dillon's suggestion infeasible? Can't we keep CPU_I386 support and just make it mutually excllusive with SMP? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message