From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Oct 31 12:50: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B138737B4CF for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:50:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id MAA82891; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:50:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:50:03 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200010312050.MAA82891@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ville Eerola Subject: Re: ports/22382: Change request for fetchmail port Reply-To: Ville Eerola Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/22382; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ville Eerola To: Peter Pentchev Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, blovett@oneinsane.net Subject: Re: ports/22382: Change request for fetchmail port Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:40:14 +0200 (EET) Hi! Peter Pentchev writes: > The patch in the PR is not quite sufficient, I think; the patch that I had > already sent to the maintainer (Ville Eerola ) contains a little > tweaking of files/patch-ah (to ./Makefile - the install paths > changed a bit). > > I'm attaching my version of the patch, just in case; but wouldn't it be > better to wait for the port maintainer to react? :) Once again, thanks for the patch. And as usual, it seems to be a complete and working one. I have been a little late in reacting to your mail to me. I think that with your additions, the patch in the PR is OK to be committed to the repository. So, any committers reading this, please go ahead... Regards, Ville -- Ville Eerola | Powered by ve@sci.fi | FreeBSD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message