From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 2 06:40:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA00798 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 2 May 1997 06:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coconut.blueberry.co.uk ([194.70.52.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA00793 for ; Fri, 2 May 1997 06:40:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nik@localhost) by coconut.blueberry.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA11968; Fri, 2 May 1997 14:39:45 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <19970502143945.17320@blueberry.co.uk> Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 14:39:45 +0100 From: Nik Clayton To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: The taste of FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.69e Organization: Blueberry New Media Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk How do, If you were looking for a sysadmin to maintain a FreeBSD system, which flavour(s) of commercial Unix would you consider to be closest to it in terms of 'feel'? I'm guessing SunOS 4.1.3, but figured there are probably a few more opinions on the topic out there. . . N -- --+=[ Blueberry Hill Blueberry New Media ]=+-- --+=[ http://www.blueberry.co.uk/ 1/9 Chelsea Harbour Design Centre, ]=+-- --+=[ WebMaster@blueberry.co.uk London, England, SW10 0XE ]=+-- --+=[ Those who do not read Dilbert are doomed to repeat it ]ENTP