From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 17 09:24:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CC116A4CE for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:24:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E6243D1F for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:24:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7H9Mic7054953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:22:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) id i7H8nlDV008741; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:49:47 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:49:47 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <20040817084947.GB97542@ip.net.ua> References: <20040816183746.GC33984@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:24:43 -0000 --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 07:13:27PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 06:03:33PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > It seems netgraph is only build on ia64 and i386. > > > > Can someone please explain why ? > > > > > > > I think this is an omission from the old days. If it > > > survives ``make universe'', this should probably be > > > committed. Gleb, do you feel like testing this with > > > ``make universe''? > > > > modules at least compiled on amd64 (with warnings in two of them). > > haven't rebooted yet. >=20 > and they load: >=20 [...] > unfortunately I neither do not have the resources for a make universe > at the moment. >=20 I'm testing the patch with "make universe" -- will take some time on a 800MHz CPU. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBIcarqRfpzJluFF4RAh3CAJ0fKEAFio7yX85ImTNBY3RDlSEBrQCbBJ3U VBn9QICIAWBEClsVE6k8130= =izbe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU--