From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 9 15:17:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5321065673 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:17:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB928FC1B for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:17:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=ORLNuOZgTqsZnFIU1L/3cZWJWTTRI4UgDQvDRK2wRBU=; b=nDBWHR4bjn8SLaE2UQ4HhwE0WJb0jgaH5cYU2tYZkgXD88pY6igh4DyMMPCLNoqanPmGMwZ+3NaGJ5cWsR764K8OEa3yRTue/1rYM6q82haU5NHehGuGTBXYFS/+Zsm6; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SoFhv-000KzF-GE for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:17:07 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1341847017-94480-94479/5/98; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:16:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <89AB703D-E075-4AAC-AC1B-B358CC4E4E7F@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4FF8C3A1.9080805@FreeBSD.org> <4FF9ECB5.5090507@FreeBSD.org> <863951nrpy.fsf@ds4.des.no> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 10:16:46 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <863951nrpy.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: Replacing BIND with unbound X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:17:08 -0000 On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 05:39:37 -0500, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav = wrote: > What sort of benchmarks do you envision? Unlike named, unbound is > intended to serve only one client (localhost) or a small number of > clients (a SOHO). Highly disagree; we use it (ISP) as our resolving nameserver for all of =20 our customers.