Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:41:22 +0200 From: Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@wolfpond.org> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: subversion-1.1.3 Message-ID: <20050408064122.GC45371@aoi.wolfpond.org> In-Reply-To: <4255E43C.8010804@freebsd.org> References: <425564D9.5050504@LogicX.us> <4255DC88.6060608@freebsd.org> <4255E04B.6020601@LogicX.us> <4255E43C.8010804@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 09:54:04AM +0800, David Xu wrote: > I heard only -O works, -O2 does not work, -Os sometimes is a higher > optimization > level than -O2. AFAIK, -Os is only a subset of -O2. -Os only includes the -O2 optimisations which don't increase code size; it gives generally better performance than -O2 due to a better cache footprint. I have found this particularly true when using VIA C3 processors. -- Francois Tigeot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050408064122.GC45371>