From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Oct 27 16:27:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA20293 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:27:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kerouac.deepwell.com (deepwell.com [209.63.174.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA20288 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:27:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@deepwell.com) Received: (qmail 8735 invoked from network); 28 Oct 1998 00:52:30 -0000 Received: from terry.dcomm.net (HELO terry) (209.63.174.33) by deepwell.com with SMTP; 28 Oct 1998 00:52:30 -0000 Message-Id: <4.1.0.67.19981027162336.0097e100@mail1.dcomm.net> X-Sender: freebsd@mail.deepwell.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.67 (Beta) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:25:43 -0700 To: Archie Cobbs , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Deepwell Internet Subject: Re: Using IPFW and DIVERT/TEE sockest to capture data (for intensive firewall logging) In-Reply-To: <199810272352.PAA14063@bubba.whistle.com> References: <19981025202914.D14664@best.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Are there plans to enhance IPFW to do this in the near future? At 03:52 PM 10/27/98 -0800, you wrote: >Jan B. Koum writes: >> To answer your question: I don't think tee is actually implemented >> right now. I remember Archie Cobbs and Luigi Rizzo talking about it >> back a month or two ago on one of the lists.. > >True, ipfw tee is NOT currently implemented. > >-Archie > >___________________________________________________________________________ >Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message