From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri May 17 19:53:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA14184
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 17 May 1996 19:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA14178
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 May 1996 19:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.7.5/CET-v2.1) id LAA08571; Sat, 18 May 1996 11:53:18 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 11:53:18 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To: Philippe Regnauld <regnauld@tetard.hsc.fr>
cc: hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Standard Shipping Containers - A Proposal for Distributing FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <199605171051.MAA06281@tetard.hsc.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960518114815.8524C-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 17 May 1996, Philippe Regnauld wrote:

> 	Errm, so far I've only seen a majority of people satisifed with the
> 	installation procedure (like  those  "great work guys" messages  we
> 	see popping up every once  in a while)  AND the source distribution
> 	system  ("Wow,  it's much easier  to  keep up with  FBSD, 'cause at
> 	least there's only one source). IMHO, Linux  is STILL a pain in the
> 	ass, and  3/4  Linux owners around  me are  "waiting  for  that new
> 	Debian release so I can trash my xxxx".  Not to mention keeping the
> 	kernel in  sync  with the rest  of the   system  when Torvalds goes
> 	epileptic.

Agreed.

> 	If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It. 

No way.  If It Ain't Broke, Make It Better.

-mike hancock