From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 17:41:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2224106566C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C471B8FC15 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC657E818; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:41:19 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:41:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA4; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) References: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> In-Reply-To: <7B9397B189EB6E46A5EE7B4C8A4BB7CB3042DC5F@MBX03.exg5.exghost.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909161941.04441.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Peter Steele Subject: Re: Can lagg0 failback be prevented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:41:09 -0000 On Wednesday 16 September 2009 16:12:25 Peter Steele wrote: > The problem we're having is when nfe0 comes online again, a failback occurs > making nfe0 active again. This causes a momentary network outage that we > want to prevent. Is there a way to configure the lagg device to stay with > the currently active interface, even if the MASTER interface comes back > online? Not really, unless you manually change master. However I believe this also causes a slight or even bigger network outage. Any reason you're not using loadbalance algorithm, since it seems to suit you better? -- Mel