From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 16 07:02:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB7C16A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E33B43D45 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 07:02:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C396314749; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:02:50 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:02:50 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Doug Cook In-Reply-To: <91D7F2CEE3425A4A9D11311D09FCE24608646352@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: michael johnson cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Solved: Error building XFree86 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 14:02:51 -0000 On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Doug Cook wrote: > I'm not entirely certain how I ended up with both on my system, but I > did, and fairly recently, too. Someone had recently introduced (by mistake) a dependency on 'imake' rather than 'imake-4' in a port. It went uncaught for a period of time until I tried to verify that I really could nuke 'imake' ... and found that I couldn't. So, systems that installed whatever port that was, during that window, would have wound up with both. mcl