From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 14:39:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2434A4 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2F7626 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:39:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0IEd5Wi057893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:39:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0IEd0na057890; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:39:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:39:00 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris Maness Subject: Re: Acer Aspire AXC-603-UB17 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 07:39:05 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:39:57 -0000 On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Chris Maness wrote: > Likely UEFI with SecureBoot enabled.  Turn SecureBoot off, enable "legacy" or "CSM" booting in what was formerly known as the BIOS setup screens. > > > > Yes, I had turned SecureBoot off.  There does not seem to be an option for legacy or CSM in the BIOS menu. > > I cannot get it to even see my memory stick with a FreeBSD install image on it.  Even my macbook pro mostly boots this and hangs on some hardware issues (as I expected but just wanted > to make sure the usb stick was actually bootable). UEFI alone might do that. Only UEFI-approved boot devices are shown unless legacy or compatibility mode is enabled. Unfortunately, there are varying names and methods in the settings between different manufacturers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 16:05:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97642101 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E50DE10 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id hs14so25285023lab.11 for ; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:05:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aah65k7De0zVhCeUQnBgUvNprw113N1ANPYs/Ail+QY=; b=daLu3bR0+utkcYbJid894uRQwhambNnrq+bhZ3va9J5Uom0bJHhMg7THnC5k4EQjjI E0fG73LE4oLkn8ciSIHHZCyi1CaYRpo8eAuDUwsclrTFLHrigclzxg6JpK1QbvD0ys52 2/Jn9dYNXMqvbswSS8ygwNY87JOY5T8m4BKSuRkROlL/3nQnej9Jsc/DyDk4wqz+4G4/ 9i47b1SbOPTGIOZa454XN3hEGOCvP5XAw5LF1I+X3YTcACQI+DRlB1+H6qEyofYjU5fK wvXs3TKYgYiPMy9LyPfpycMSTggaGFId10lh21QZkS84a9QOq3iklD4Z+g+N5OTGiNmF /kDw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzffWAbI3NSdqI2opcNHzpeKgn1fhGLbwe9r1pNb93Br+YzscgTnAM8CSPJvPEpcKS7yp+ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.238.1 with SMTP id vg1mr25538391lac.83.1421597123164; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.47.75 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 08:05:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54BA8552.8070102@my.hennepintech.edu> References: <54BA8552.8070102@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:05:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Request for comments - svnup in base ? From: Damien Fleuriot To: Andrew Berg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 16:05:32 -0000 On 17 January 2015 at 16:52, Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2015.01.17 09:24, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On a related topic, how would you guys feel about svnup being part of > BASE ? > > > > Or perhaps, include a bootstrap install much like pkg has. > > > > I for one, would very much like it. > What advantage does it have over svnlite(1)? > > Andrew, Emmanuel, I wouldn't know, first time I hear of the binary. It may be failure on my part but I do not remember having read about it in any of the handbook's pages either.