From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 26 22:21:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2530106566C for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 22:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272BD8FC16 for ; Tue, 26 May 2009 22:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4AA14D5B95; Wed, 27 May 2009 00:04:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at t-hosting.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9PHHH2-X4pGB; Wed, 27 May 2009 00:04:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (catv-80-98-231-64.catv.broadband.hu [80.98.231.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6799214D591A; Wed, 27 May 2009 00:04:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A1C676C.1080304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:04:28 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ed Schouten References: <20090526213921.GD48776@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090526213921.GD48776@hoeg.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: CFT: ee 1.5.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 22:22:00 -0000 Ed Schouten escribió: > Hi all, > > Some days ago Bruce Cran and I were talking on IRC about the ancient > version of ee(1) we have in the tree. Today I spent some time moving > ee(1) to contrib/ee with proper mergeinfo in place, to make it easier to > upgrade it. > > It turns out all local modifications we have to ee(1) right now (line > numbers, mktemp, etc) have been implemented upstream as well, in most > cases even better. So I've decided to switch to an almost clean copy of > ee(1). > Thanks a lot for taking care of ee! I've been using it for a long time and I think it's a nice editor and its greatest advantage is that it's in the base system. Btw, I have a Hungarian catalog for ee, I'll review that one after your update. -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org