From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep  2 11:29:00 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D703516A4BF
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 11:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from light.sdf.com (light.sdf.com [207.200.153.231])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2AA43FD7
	for <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Sep 2003 11:28:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tom@sdf.com)
Received: from tom (helo=localhost)
	by light.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.22)
	id 19uFtU-000M0G-LM; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 11:28:44 -0700
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom <tom@light.sdf.com>
To: Haesu <haesu@towardex.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030902171751.GA42133@scylla.towardex.com>
Message-ID: <20030902112259.C63339@light.sdf.com>
References: <0AF1BBDF1218F14E9B4CCE414744E70F07DF30@exchange.wanglobal.net>
	<20030902144649.GA34440@scylla.towardex.com>
	<20030902171751.GA42133@scylla.towardex.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: Tom <tom@sdf.com>
cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Multi-Homed Routing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Services Providers <freebsd-isp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 18:29:01 -0000


On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Haesu wrote:

> < snip >
>
> >
> >   Yes, most carriers do use them.  But a major carrier is not going to use
> > some fly-by-night route registry.  In fact, several carriers operate their
> > own registries, and don't trust information from anywhere else.
>
> Ohhh yes, and they also mirror other IRR db's too.

  Some do, and some don't.  CW RR doesn't mirror RADB RR for instance.

> >   And you sure they are getting farther than that?  I see only three /24s
> > from your AS (presumably 27552), and a /21 and a /22.
>
> www.cidr-report.org They also provide view from three different ASes. Let see
> how many /24's you can count.

  Only three are visible to me here, which shows there is a proprogation
problem of some sort.

> >
> >   At least 10% of the routes in the table are unnecessary.
>
> No, you meant to say 28.8% gain by fixing deaggregates

  28.8% is greater than 10%, and I said that more than 10% of the routing
table is junk.

> -hc
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>   Haesu C.
>   TowardEX Technologies, Inc.
>   WWW: http://www.towardex.com
>   E-mail: haesu@towardex.com
>   Cell: (978) 394-2867


Tom