Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:16:04 +0900
From:      Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To:        perryh@pluto.rain.com
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 7.2 dies in zfs
Message-ID:  <m24oooi6gb.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <4b07ac59.A2Afaf4X0IZlrgGU%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References:  <m2skcajavv.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2r5ruja6v.wl%randy@psg.com> <4B066B13.1070006@freebsd.org> <m2bpiwitz7.wl%randy@psg.com> <4b07ac59.A2Afaf4X0IZlrgGU%perryh@pluto.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> imiho, zfs can not be called production ready if it crashes if you
>> do not stand on your left leg, put your right hand in the air, and
>> burn some eye of newt.
> ROFL!
> As with any open-source project, I suppose it will be ready
> when it is ready.  At least it hasn't been made the default.

yep.  i demand a full refund!  :)

my concern is the innocent admin putting something critical on zfs in
8.0 when it is called stable and production.  this isn't linux.

randy



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m24oooi6gb.wl%randy>