From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 22 14:41:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E58FFE; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johannes@sipsolutions.net) Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [144.76.43.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF712267; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V1HIM-0006N4-Bc; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:41:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1374504059.14517.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: So, which IEEE<->Frequency mappings should we be all using? From: Johannes Berg To: Adrian Chadd Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:40:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20130717_194238_629152_551DCEC6) References: (sfid-20130717_194238_629152_551DCEC6) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:41:05 -0000 On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 10:42 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > * 420MHz > * 700MHz > * 900MHz (which we already have, due to history); > * 3.6GHz > * 4.9GHz 3.6 should have been defined in the spec recently, 4.9 surely is defined already (though the whole stack will have to support the dot11ChannelStartingFactor) The others are kinda non-standard extensions, and you probably won't even be able to properly support them since they're kinda pretend-handled like 2.4 GHz. johannes