From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 15 12:49:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B036616A43C; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:49:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E4843D49; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:49:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pelsia.ninth-nine.com (d110.GkanagawaFL7.vectant.ne.jp [202.215.69.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/NinthNine) with ESMTP id j9FCnIV9012221; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:49:24 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:49:18 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200510151249.j9FCnIV9012221@sakura.ninth-nine.com> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> References: <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]); Sat, 15 Oct 2005 21:49:27 +0900 (JST) Cc: tux@pinguru.net, wes@FreeBSD.org, mitsuru@riken.jp, nork@FreeBSD.org, rtdean@cytherianage.net, sugimura@jp.FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:49:34 -0000 On Sat, 15 Oct 2005 09:14:59 +0900 (JST) Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi eclipse and eclipse related ports maintainers and users! > Some time ago, someone suggested that eclipse and eclipse > related ports should be located on proper categories. I > think so. So I suggest following repocopy list. Anyone, > do you have any idea? Oops, I missed. Eclipse is very similar to Emacs: 1. IDE Emacs is a one of IDE(or platform). And anyone doesn't think that it is ONLY a elisp interpreter. But it is a editor. So I think that it is no problem that Eclipse may be categolize to editors. 2. Extension-able Emacs has many extention modules like news reader, language support, games, ... 3. Mode Emacs has many mode for descriptions like C, Perl, Java, ... 4. others It must be that there are other similar feature:-). java/eclipse -> editors/eclipse java/eclipse-EPIC -> editors/eclipse-EPIC java/eclipse-cdt -> editors/eclipse-cdt java/eclipse-checkstyle -> devel/eclipse-checkstyle java/eclipse-clay-core -> databases/eclipse-clay-core java/eclipse-devel -> editors/eclipse-devel java/eclipse-emf -> editors/eclipse-emf java/eclipse-examples -> devel/eclipse-examples java/eclipse-gef -> editors/eclipse-gef java/eclipse-gef-examples -> editors/eclipse-gef-examples java/eclipse-langpack -> editors/eclipse-langpack java/eclipse-log4e -> editors/eclipse-log4e java/eclipse-lomboz -> devel/eclipse-lomboz java/eclipse-pmd -> devel/eclipse-pmd java/eclipse-quantum -> databases/eclipse-quantum java/eclipse-sqlexplorer -> databases/eclipse-sqlexplorer java/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat -> www/eclipse-sysdeo-tomcat java/eclipse-uml -> editors/eclipse-uml java/eclipse-v4all -> editors/eclipse-v4all java/eclipse-vep -> editors/eclipse-vep java/eclipse-vep-examples -> editors/eclipse-vep-examples java/eclipse-viplugin -> editors/eclipse-viplugin java/eclipseme -> devel/eclipseme java/phpeclipse -> editors/phpeclipse