Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:02:10 -0700 From: Devin Butterfield <dbutter@wireless.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>, Rajappa Iyer <rsi@panix.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sysadmin article Message-ID: <01061422021000.39234@dbm.wireless.net> In-Reply-To: <20010615001318.F1832@superconductor.rush.net> References: <200106150223.f5F2NLW08368@panix1.panix.com> <20010615001318.F1832@superconductor.rush.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 14 June 2001 9:13, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Rajappa Iyer <rsi@panix.com> [010614 22:23] wrote: > > http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107a/0107a.htm > > > > Any obvious reasons why FreeBSD performed so poorly for these people? > > Because they did benchmarks on systems without tuning. So why doesn't FreeBSD ship with a "tuned" configuration? Just curious... -- Regards, Devin. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01061422021000.39234>