From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 12 12:02:35 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BC910656B4;
	Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46218FC14;
	Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:02:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.101])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id PAA09545;
	Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:02:31 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4E6DF4D6.8050501@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 15:02:30 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:5.0) Gecko/20110705 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4E6DB696.1080608@FreeBSD.org> <201109120743.02181.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201109120743.02181.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: archaic/useless CFLAGS options for x86 boot blocks
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:02:36 -0000

on 12/09/2011 14:43 John Baldwin said the following:
> I suspect some of the recent changes to shave space down for Clang have made
> some of the optimization options no longer necessary.  

Just a note of all the options in question were added long before clang.

> I think the patch is
> fine, and I'd even prefer to go ahead and drop the extra cruft (like removing
> nops and aligns as well as -mrtd and -mregparm) from the UFS boot2 as well.

I personally agree, thank you for this suggestion.
My current plan is to leave boot2 alone until stable/9 is branched, but to try to
get zfs/gpt boot changes into 9.0.  What do you think?

-- 
Andriy Gapon