From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 29 15:33:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F8B16A41F for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0867D43D55 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDF1388CD4 for ; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:33:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:33:01 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <813B72121E0B85AAF2AB0809@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050729040834.60781.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050729040834.60781.qmail@web51612.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: itcl and iwidgets (was Re: Question about maintainers) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:33:03 -0000 --On Friday, July 29, 2005 06:08:34 +0200 pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: > Hi Paul; > > AFAIK I submitted the last itcl/itk update. One reason why your new port > doesn't work may be because iwidgets hasn't been updated (it's not an easy > task). There is more information on the PR for itcl and in a thread on > -ports, but it all sums up to itcl/itk ports being ill conceived > (hacked). > > After looking at NetBSD's pkgsrc and Darwin ports I got to the conclusion > that we need a new itcl-devel port that grabs the latest bits (containing > both itcl and itk) from the CVS; that way an updated iwidgets port can > find a consistent itcl tree and configure properly. I just never found > the time to fix itcl properly so for the time being I only cleaned some > of the hacks we had been using for years. > They seem to be working fine here. :-) The problem that I had was that the script used wish. I was using SUB_LIST and SUB_FILES to change that to wish8.4, but wish couldn't find iwidgets. After googling some, I changed it to tclsh8.4, and now the script runs fine and the program works. I'll be submitting the port in the near future, after I'm done verifying that every step works as intended. I'm also fiddling with a new iwidgets port now. If I get it working, I'll submit it as well. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/